Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής

dc.creatorLiberopoulos, G.en
dc.creatorTsikis, I.en
dc.creatorDelikouras, S.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-23T10:38:02Z
dc.date.available2015-11-23T10:38:02Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.07.015
dc.identifier.issn0925-5273
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11615/30359
dc.description.abstractThe classical economic order quantity (EOQ) model with planned penalized backorders (PB) relies on postulating a value for the backorder penalty cost coefficient, b, which is supposed to reflect the intangible adverse effect of the future loss of customer goodwill following a stockout. Recognizing that the effect of the future loss of customer goodwill should be not a direct penalty cost but a change in future demand, Schwartz [1966. A new approach to stockout penalties. Management Science 12(12), B538-B544] modified the classical EOQ-PB model by eliminating the backorder penalty cost term from the objective function and assuming that the long-run demand rate is a decreasing, strictly convex function of the customer's "disappointment factor" (defined as the complement of the demand fill rate) following a stockout, which in turn is an increasing, strictly convex function of the demand fill rate. He called the new model a perturbed demand (PD) model. Schwartz provided convincing justification for his PD model and presented several variations of it in a follow-up paper, but he did not solve any of these models. In this paper, we solve Schwartz's original PD model and its variations, and we discuss the implications of their solutions, thus filling a gap in the literature left by Schwartz. Moreover, having been convinced that Schwartz's approach is more valid than the classical approach for representing the effect of the loss of customer goodwill following a stockout, but also recognizing that the classical approach is far more popular than the PD approach, because of its simplicity and because of tradition, we use the solution of the PD model to infer the value of b in the classical model, thus providing one possible answer to the question, what could b be? A noteworthy implication of the solution of Schwartz's original PD model is that the optimal fill rate is always 0 or 1, rendering the inferred value of b in the classical model 0 or infinity, respectively. Suspecting that the property of the PD function which is most likely responsible for producing this "bang-bang" type of result is strict convexity, we show that for the case where the PD function is proportional to an integer power, say n, of the fill rate, the optimal fill rate is always 0 or 1, if and only if n > 1, in which case the PD function is strictly convex in the fill rate. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.source.uri<Go to ISI>://WOS:000272879100015
dc.subjectEconomic order quantityen
dc.subjectStockouten
dc.subjectBackordersen
dc.subjectPerturbed demanden
dc.subjectOPTIMAL INVENTORY POLICIESen
dc.subjectCONSUMER RESPONSEen
dc.subjectSTOCK-OUTSen
dc.subjectSERVICEen
dc.subjectDEMANDen
dc.subjectMODELen
dc.subjectCOMPETITIONen
dc.subjectMANAGEMENTen
dc.subjectDYNAMICSen
dc.subjectSYSTEMen
dc.subjectEngineering, Industrialen
dc.subjectEngineering, Manufacturingen
dc.subjectOperations Researchen
dc.subject& Management Scienceen
dc.titleBackorder penalty cost coefficient "b": What could it be?en
dc.typejournalArticleen


Αρχεία σε αυτό το τεκμήριο

ΑρχείαΜέγεθοςΤύποςΠροβολή

Δεν υπάρχουν αρχεία που να σχετίζονται με αυτό το τεκμήριο.

Αυτό το τεκμήριο εμφανίζεται στις ακόλουθες συλλογές

Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής