• English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • italiano 
    • English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • Login
Mostra Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • Mostra Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • Mostra Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Tutto DSpace
  • Archivi & Collezioni
  • Data di pubblicazione
  • Autori
  • Titoli
  • Soggetti

A New Sampling Approach for the Detection of Swine Influenza a Virus on European Sow Farms

Thumbnail
Autore
Lillie-Jaschniski K., Lisgara M., Pileri E., Jardin A., Velazquez E., Köchling M., Albin M., Casanovas C., Skampardonis V., Stadler J.
Data
2022
Language
en
DOI
10.3390/vetsci9070338
Soggetto
age distribution
Article
clinical feature
controlled study
cross-sectional study
Europe
female
multiplex real time polymerase chain reaction
nonhuman
nose smear
pig farming
piglet
real time polymerase chain reaction
sampling
sow (swine)
suckling animal
swine influenza virus
virus detection
weaner
MDPI
Mostra tutti i dati dell'item
Abstract
Swine influenza A virus (swIAV), which plays a major role in the porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC), is eliminated from the respiratory tract within 7–9 days after infection. Therefore, diagnosis is complicated in endemically infected swine herds presenting no obvious clinical signs. This study aimed to investigate the right time point for sampling to detect swIAV. A cross-sectional study was performed in 131 farms from 12 European countries. The sampling protocol included suckling piglets, weaners, and nursery pigs. In each age group, 10 nasal swabs were collected and further examined in pools of 5 for swIAV by Matrix rRT-PCR, followed by a multiplex RT-PCR to determine the influenza subtype. SwIAV was detected in 284 (37.9%) of the samples and on 103 (78.6%) farms. Despite the highest number of animals with clinical signs being found in the nursery, the weaners were significantly more often virus-positive compared to nursery pigs (p = 0.048). Overall, the swIAV detection rate did not significantly differ between diseased or non-diseased suckling and nursery piglets, respectively; however, diseased weaners had significantly more positive pools than the non-diseased animals. Interestingly, in 9 farms, different subtypes were detected in different age groups. Our findings indicate that to detect all circulating swIAV subtypes on a farm, different age groups should be sampled. Additionally, the sampling strategy should also aim to include non-diseased animals, especially in the suckling period. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11615/75925
Collections
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ. [19743]
htmlmap 

 

Ricerca

Tutto DSpaceArchivi & CollezioniData di pubblicazioneAutoriTitoliSoggettiQuesta CollezioneData di pubblicazioneAutoriTitoliSoggetti

My Account

LoginRegistrazione
Help Contact
DepositionAboutHelpContattaci
Choose LanguageTutto DSpace
EnglishΕλληνικά
htmlmap