• English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • Deutsch 
    • English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • Einloggen
Dokumentanzeige 
  •   DSpace Startseite
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • Dokumentanzeige
  •   DSpace Startseite
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • Dokumentanzeige
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Gesamter Bestand
  • Bereiche & Sammlungen
  • Erscheinungsdatum
  • Autoren
  • Titeln
  • Schlagworten

Radiomics and machine learning can differentiate transient osteoporosis from avascular necrosis of the hip

Thumbnail
Autor
Klontzas M.E., Manikis G.C., Nikiforaki K., Vassalou E.E., Spanakis K., Stathis I., Kakkos G.A., Matthaiou N., Zibis A.H., Marias K., Karantanas A.H.
Datum
2021
Language
en
DOI
10.3390/diagnostics11091686
Schlagwort
adult
Article
avascular necrosis
comparative study
controlled study
demography
female
human
machine learning
major clinical study
male
musculoskeletal radiologist
nuclear magnetic resonance imaging
osteoporosis
radiomics
retrospective study
MDPI
Zur Langanzeige
Zusammenfassung
Differentiation between transient osteoporosis (TOH) and avascular necrosis (AVN) of the hip is a longstanding challenge in musculoskeletal radiology. The purpose of this study was to utilize MRI-based radiomics and machine learning (ML) for accurate differentiation between the two entities. A total of 109 hips with TOH and 104 hips with AVN were retrospectively included. Femoral heads and necks with segmented radiomics features were extracted. Three ML classifiers (XGboost, CatBoost and SVM) using 38 relevant radiomics features were trained on 70% and validated on 30% of the dataset. ML performance was compared to two musculoskeletal radiologists, a general radiologist and two radiology residents. XGboost achieved the best performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 93.7% (95% CI from 87.7 to 99.8%) among ML models. MSK radiologists achieved an AUC of 90.6% (95% CI from 86.7% to 94.5%) and 88.3% (95% CI from 84% to 92.7%), respectively, similar to residents. The general radiologist achieved an AUC of 84.5% (95% CI from 80% to 89%), significantly lower than of XGboost (p = 0.017). In conclusion, radiomics-based ML achieved a performance similar to MSK radiologists and significantly higher compared to general radiologists in differentiating between TOH and AVN. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11615/74919
Collections
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ. [19743]
htmlmap 

 

Stöbern

Gesamter BestandBereiche & SammlungenErscheinungsdatumAutorenTitelnSchlagwortenDiese SammlungErscheinungsdatumAutorenTitelnSchlagworten

Mein Benutzerkonto

EinloggenRegistrieren
Help Contact
DepositionAboutHelpKontakt
Choose LanguageGesamter Bestand
EnglishΕλληνικά
htmlmap