• English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • italiano 
    • English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • Login
Mostra Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • Mostra Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • Mostra Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Tutto DSpace
  • Archivi & Collezioni
  • Data di pubblicazione
  • Autori
  • Titoli
  • Soggetti

Energy commodities: A review of optimal hedging strategies

Thumbnail
Autore
Halkos G.E., Tsirivis A.S.
Data
2019
Language
en
DOI
10.3390/en12203979
Soggetto
Commerce
Investments
Power markets
Risk management
Risk perception
Wooden fences
Energy commodity
Expected utility
Hedge ratio
Hedging strategies
Risk aversion
Financial markets
MDPI AG
Mostra tutti i dati dell'item
Abstract
Energy is considered as a commodity nowadays and continuous access along with price stability is of vital importance for every economic agent worldwide. The aim of the current review paper is to present in detail the two dominant hedging strategies relative to energy portfolios, the Minimum-Variance hedge ratio and the expected utility maximization methodology. The Minimum-Variance hedge ratio approach is by far the most popular in literature as it is less time consuming and computationally demanding; nevertheless by applying the appropriate multivariate model Garch family volatility model, it can provide a very reliable estimation of the optimal hedge ratio. However, this becomes possible at the cost of a rather restrictive assumption for infinite hedger’s risk aversion. Within an uncertain worldwide economic climate and a highly volatile energy market, energy producers, retailers and consumers had to become more adaptive and develop the necessary energy risk management and optimal hedging strategies. The estimation gap of an optimal hedge ratio that would be subject to the investor’s risk preferences through time is filled by the relatively more complex and sophisticated expected utility maximization methodology. Nevertheless, if hedgers share infinite risk aversion or if alternatively the expected futures price is approximately zero the two methodologies become equivalent. The current review shows that when evidence from the energy market during periods of extremely volatile economic climate is considered, both hypotheses can be violated, hence it becomes reasonable that especially for extended hedging horizons it would be wise for potential hedgers to take into consideration both methodologies in order to build a successful and profitable hedging strategy. © 2019 by the authors.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11615/73874
Collections
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ. [19743]
htmlmap 

 

Ricerca

Tutto DSpaceArchivi & CollezioniData di pubblicazioneAutoriTitoliSoggettiQuesta CollezioneData di pubblicazioneAutoriTitoliSoggetti

My Account

LoginRegistrazione
Help Contact
DepositionAboutHelpContattaci
Choose LanguageTutto DSpace
EnglishΕλληνικά
htmlmap