• English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • italiano 
    • English
    • Ελληνικά
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • italiano
    • español
  • Login
Mostra Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • Mostra Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Επιστημονικές Δημοσιεύσεις Μελών ΠΘ (ΕΔΠΘ)
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ.
  • Mostra Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Tutto DSpace
  • Archivi & Collezioni
  • Data di pubblicazione
  • Autori
  • Titoli
  • Soggetti

Accuracy of anti-ribosomal P protein antibody testing for the diagnosis of neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus - An international meta-analysis

Thumbnail
Autore
Karassa, F. B.; Afeltra, A.; Ambrozic, A.; Chang, D. M.; De Keyser, F.; Doria, A.; Galeazzi, M.; Hirohata, S.; Hoffman, I. E. A.; Inanc, M.; Massardo, L.; Mathieu, A.; Mok, C. C.; Morozzi, G.; Sanna, G.; Spindler, A. J.; Tzioufas, A. G.; Yoshio, T.; Ioannidis, J. P. A.
Data
2006
DOI
10.1002/art.21539
Soggetto
PSYCHIATRIC MANIFESTATIONS
RHEUMATIC-DISEASES
RENAL-DISEASE
AUTOANTIBODIES
ASSOCIATION
GUIDELINES
PSYCHOSIS
CRITERIA
CLASSIFICATION
POPULATIONS
Rheumatology
Mostra tutti i dati dell'item
Abstract
Objective. To quantitatively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of antibodies to ribosomal P proteins (anti-P) for neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) in general, for psychosis, mood disorder, or both, and for other diffuse manifestations. Methods. This international meta-analysis combined standardized data from 1,537 lupus patients contributed by 14 research teams. Weighted estimation of sensitivity and specificity with fixed-effects and random-effects models, as well as summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve analysis, was used to summarize test performance. The robustness of the overall estimates was examined in sensitivity analyses that included additional studies published up to November 1, 2004 in the Medline, EMBase, and Cochrane databases. Results. Combining the data from the 14 teams, the weighted sensitivity and specificity estimates for the diagnosis of NPSLE were 26% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 15-42%) and 80% (95% CI 74-85%), respectively. For psychosis, mood disorder, or both, the sensitivity and specificity were 27% (95% CI 14-47%) and 80% (95% CI 74-85%), respectively. For other diffuse manifestations, the sensitivity was 24% (95% CI 12-42%), and the specificity was 80% (95% CI 73-85%). The proportion of patients with anti-P antibodies did not vary markedly across different presentations of NPSLE. Between-study heterogeneity was substantial, but the SROC curves were consistent with the weighted estimates. In further analyses that included another 24 published studies, only the sensitivity for psychosis and/or mood disorder was slightly improved, but it was still suboptimal (42% [95% Cl 30-53%]); the specificity remained essentially the same (81% [95% Cl 76-85%]). Conclusion. Anti-P antibody testing has limited diagnostic value for NPSLE, and it is not helpful in differentiating among various disease phenotypes.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11615/29108
Collections
  • Δημοσιεύσεις σε περιοδικά, συνέδρια, κεφάλαια βιβλίων κλπ. [19743]
htmlmap 

 

Ricerca

Tutto DSpaceArchivi & CollezioniData di pubblicazioneAutoriTitoliSoggettiQuesta CollezioneData di pubblicazioneAutoriTitoliSoggetti

My Account

LoginRegistrazione
Help Contact
DepositionAboutHelpContattaci
Choose LanguageTutto DSpace
EnglishΕλληνικά
htmlmap